<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the fact that this has come up requires an answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getofftheinternet.org/the-fact-that-this-has-come-up-requires-an-answer/2009/03/24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getofftheinternet.org/the-fact-that-this-has-come-up-requires-an-answer/2009/03/24/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to bringing you the best of the worst.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget Callahan</title>
		<link>http://www.getofftheinternet.org/the-fact-that-this-has-come-up-requires-an-answer/2009/03/24/comment-page-1/#comment-26569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Callahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getofftheinternet.org/?p=201#comment-26569</guid>
		<description>I love the way this site is evolving :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the way this site is evolving <img src='http://www.getofftheinternet.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.getofftheinternet.org/the-fact-that-this-has-come-up-requires-an-answer/2009/03/24/comment-page-1/#comment-25084</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getofftheinternet.org/?p=201#comment-25084</guid>
		<description>Interesting post - what is your point?
Are you trying to debunk what you perceive as a silly fringe movement or just make fun of those who, last I checked, have a right to question something they see as a threat to their country and therefore their freedom?

I&#039;m sure you could find fault with that statement as well, but think about it - wouldn&#039;t you rather be safe than sorry?

I truely believe if Obama had gotten in office and governed the way he campaigned, more people would be inclined to put more trust in him and the few documents he has released.  But, he has swerved VERY far to the left and leaves the impression that he isn&#039;t quite capable of the job before him.  His past questionable activities and mysterious past, not to mention his multitude of different names, makes people a little unsure.  Why does having a gut feeling that makes you want some clarification or ask some questions - suddenly put you in the nutcase category?

It&#039;s like saying, those that questioned Nixon and his questionable activities in office must have been nutcases - why surely we shouldn&#039;t question our leaders, of course, they are all above reproach!  Yeah, right.  Give me a break.  If you&#039;re a politician, you&#039;re corrupt, some more so than others. 

Personally, I&#039;d rather err on the side of caution and have my President be totally above board and legit - I guess it is just not that important to others.  But really, does that make me a nutjob?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post &#8211; what is your point?<br />
Are you trying to debunk what you perceive as a silly fringe movement or just make fun of those who, last I checked, have a right to question something they see as a threat to their country and therefore their freedom?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you could find fault with that statement as well, but think about it &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t you rather be safe than sorry?</p>
<p>I truely believe if Obama had gotten in office and governed the way he campaigned, more people would be inclined to put more trust in him and the few documents he has released.  But, he has swerved VERY far to the left and leaves the impression that he isn&#8217;t quite capable of the job before him.  His past questionable activities and mysterious past, not to mention his multitude of different names, makes people a little unsure.  Why does having a gut feeling that makes you want some clarification or ask some questions &#8211; suddenly put you in the nutcase category?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like saying, those that questioned Nixon and his questionable activities in office must have been nutcases &#8211; why surely we shouldn&#8217;t question our leaders, of course, they are all above reproach!  Yeah, right.  Give me a break.  If you&#8217;re a politician, you&#8217;re corrupt, some more so than others. </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d rather err on the side of caution and have my President be totally above board and legit &#8211; I guess it is just not that important to others.  But really, does that make me a nutjob?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey (not the Casey from Ravelry)</title>
		<link>http://www.getofftheinternet.org/the-fact-that-this-has-come-up-requires-an-answer/2009/03/24/comment-page-1/#comment-24749</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey (not the Casey from Ravelry)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getofftheinternet.org/?p=201#comment-24749</guid>
		<description>This is serious.  Do not joke about it.  Go to http://www.obamacrimes.info/ to learn more (and relieve yourself of some cash).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is serious.  Do not joke about it.  Go to <a href="http://www.obamacrimes.info/" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamacrimes.info/</a> to learn more (and relieve yourself of some cash).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

