It’s not just American web-sites that attract people who have no business being allowed near a keyboard. Take, for example, this story from ynet news in Israel, about a gay couple who, after fostering a child thrown out by his family for being gay, were finally, after fourteen years of court petitions, allowed to adopt the boy, now a grown man.

Touching, heartwarming story, right?

You haven’t been on the internet very long, have you?

2 gay males and a younger gay male they call a son. Yep,just
what the world needs , more of. Yuk,yuk,yuk

homosexuals are the product of failing cultures. go against nature, and nature will go against you. now reap what you sow.

Whether or not these two gay men *love* this kid is irrelevant. It is unfortunate that liberal courts allow unnatural relationships such as these to further taint society.

The world is near its end!
Gay couple???? Shame, shame, shame!

a purim joke-or a sad story.
wake up it”s against the torah to be a homo

Well to be honest, I really like Irans approach to the
whole gay matter!

All class, these people.

arabs look to mecca for religion & to jerusalem for sex?
palestinian suggest jerusalem to become the symbol for the gays in the arab world, i wonder why.

I am shocked at reading this. What about the Mitzvot against such unions let alone adoption by such? This hypocrasy will destroy Israel! Haven’t we learned this over the centuries? I must convert to Judaism because my mother wasn’t pure enough according to Israeli standards, but an openly homosexual couple, expressly forbidden by Torah, is allowed to flourish within the boundaries of Israel and adopt.

I am not voicing a condemnation of any Jew. I let G-d make those choices. The blatant disregard for the instruction from G-d made public only shames good observant Jews and brings about condemnation from G-d for such an open violation of Torah. I am not advocating discipline or old Temple justice, but a recognition of this evil for what it is and a censure of such an openly public view. Please consider during this celebration of Purim, that G-d saved us to live as prescribed, not to violate the basic standards of Judaism. I celebrate the salvation of Judaism and you report the destruction of it.

More news like that,
more I understand Palestinians.

…they just wanted the state to sponsor their threesomes…. thats quite pathetic of the state to grant official status to homosexual orgies…its nothing else but that…and i have nothing against gays…but threesomes are just plain wrong..

Really classy, these people.



Free Range Kids is a new parenting blog, arguing against the over-protective urges many contemporary parents display.

So, as is usual whenever anyone thinks of the “the children” things get a bit…interesting.

Perhaps an additional point can be made that our kids are vulnerable (parents too!) because we no longer have the ability to defend ourselves from an attack, and because we cannot have a cop everywhere at once. Of course our society is not as gentle as it once was; thank the deliberate suppression of the Judeo-Christian ethic for that one! We don’t like to get involved because a) we might get sued or b), we don’t really care.

Maybe it’s time for us to take another good, hard look at the purpose of the Second Amendment.

Cathy wrote: “We parents live in a police state. We have no choice but to keep our kids prisoner.”

THAT’S NOT TRUE!!!!!

We have something called “Liberty”, bought and paid for by the blood of the patriots, and enshrined in the Constitution. It’s like anything else: Use it or lose it!

In some states, leaving a child under 12 unattended could get you in trouble with the police — neglect, I believe. This isn’t the 60’s or 50’s. Ask Adam Walsh’s family. His mom left him playing video games in a Sear’s store while she shopped in another department. John Walsh is the star of America’s Most Wanted TV show. Young Adam was kidnapped and murdered.

I just wanted to send a little note.

When I called the police department they said they couldn’t take your child into protective custody without a home address.

Would you be so kind as to provide it for me?

I wonder where you live. Upper West Side? How about living in the Bronx, or maybe Brownsville?

You think you are some type of fucking iconoclast – but please keep in mind of where the hell you LIVE.

Why don’t you go move to Hollis, and let your kid go FREE RANGE there?

Ah, yes…it all comes down to being scared of the black people sometimes, doesn’t it.



The folks at mothering.com weigh in on J-Lo’s Lack of Lactivism:

On Celebrity Babies there is part of the interview from People magazine posted and she says that she isn’t breastfeeding because her mother didn’t breastfeed. Then in the comments there are a bunch of people saying good for her for admitting she didn’t want to do it. The most brilliant comment is the one that says that if you are going to breastfeed you should do it because you enjoy it. Yeah, I know that is my reasoning in all my parenting decisions. How about breastfeeding because it’s best for the baby? Nah, too selfless.

Even if she doesn’t want to she could easily hire a wet nurse or buy BM.

You read my mind. She can hire me to wet nurse lol. At least she was honest. However, my parents made poor choices, that doesn’t mean I have to do the same. ETA: I’m just thinking about all the women who’d love to nurse but can’t or have great difficulty with it b/c they have to work. There Jennifer is, with all the money in the world doesn’t have to work another day in her life and won’t even give it a shot.

So maybe I should only change DS’s diapers if I enjoy it, huh? Then again, changing diapers “just isn’t for me,” so maybe I won’t. Unless there’s a real barrier to BF’ing, I just have a hard time seeing it as optional.

So who is going to write to People about this? Fine, she chose to FF, but what it ridiculous about her comment was “best for them”. that is the most asinine reason I have ever heard for not ffing. why doesn’t she just say she doesn’t want to use her breasts? or that she can’t stand the thought of it? or some other real reason. not because its best for *them*. its best for *HER*. duh. that needs to be clarified in a letter to People. and I think I am too annoyed to write it.