The Hollywood Reporter’s James Hibberd has a blog called The Live Feed, where he notes that the ratings of three shows – Grey’s Anatomy, Survivor and The Office – have dropped compared to last year. Who’s to blame? The liberals, of course!

Right out of the gate:

I think everyone is sick and tired of bubbleheaded hollywood types making stupid political statements. They have turned alot of people off with their ultra-liberal and down right ignorant views…
Of course, quickly people show up to agree!
I agree with Jeff on this one. Too many hollywood types voicing their liberal political nonsense has turned me and my family from watching their shows. In fact I will go a step further and say that everyone I work with feels the same.

Absolutely. I’m tired of funding those anti-America weirdos.

We don’t tune in to watch anything on NBC, ABC, MSNBC or CNN anymore. They’re too biased!

About the only thing we watch on television anymore is the news on Fox along with Bill O’reilly and Hannity & Colmes.


dito with all the above comments. I quit watching tv when hollywierd starting pushing its left-wing agenda. At least return to a moderate posistion or I won’t come back. I don’t need your agenda in my household.

You know that when you switch over to CBS and see 3 obama ads all within 10 mintues that it’s time to turn the channel, for GOOD!

And then we get “Poppa Gus,” whose name I keep singing to the tune of “Papa Large” by Ultramagnetic MCs. He’s apparently some kind of media expert:
TV broadcast programs are finished !
I have not not or ever will I watch any of the programs , On CBS ABC NBC, especially with that talentless Letterman!CBS is off limits
in my home .no substance, terrible acting,in fact unreal..where do this find said Actors, In fact ,They Ltterman Leno, Mauer,are not funny,just sarcastic ,try to pass this off as Humor.
I guarentee they will not be around Next year.
Poppa Gus

Grey’s Anatomy? Ugly Betty? Shouldn’t these “shows” be on Bravo, the Gay cable channel? TV is for non-thinking lemmings who bend to the Left and need to be told what to think.

Kieth Olberman is loud-mouthed douche with a very large head.


I mean, yeah, Olbermann’s a bit douchey, but he’s not on the cast of any of the mentioned shows…is he? It goes on and on and on, but this is my favorite “What.” moment:
I have seen Jamie Kennedy’s movie Heckler so I will preface my comments with “In my humble non-professional opinion”, My name is Earl has run its course. The writers are starting to go soft. What next? A fantasy sequence where they all dress up in medieval attire, or go back in time to gangster days in Chicago. It should have ended when he went to jail.
The Office is starting to look tired also, still entertaining, but its luster is wearing thin. But they are BOTH better than that 30 Rock. I can only ascribe 30 Rock’s staying power to the fact that there are so many “Red Sea pedestrians” on that show. Same reason “Arrested Development” kept on long after ratings should have killed it. I realize writing is a difficult profession to maintain high ground and I appreciate the efforts, but yawn, Its all getting so predicatable and been there done that. Feel free to come to my job and criticize my software, I deserve it.
It gets more insane from there. Looking at a lot of the left-bashing craziness, I see a real consistency in their language and grammar, which makes me think that one guy is spamming the comments and others have grabbed onto his “message” and want to get out their vitriol against the networks, the liberal media, and Barack Obama.

(I never need to see “Nobama” again. Seriously.)

It goes on for about 900 comments or so, if you’re curious. You really don’t need to click over.



Etsy Is Political


by evilolive

With tags like art, print, digital, political, obama, whiners, democrats, hypocrisy, easystreet studio sells photo montages of Barak and Michelle Obama.

You can demonstrate your pet’s political affiliation with a shih tzu dog for obama button or declare that you are Reppin’ for Obama, or enjoy some shrinky dink art of Obama with Mr. Potato Head.

Perhaps you would like a Liberal hand embroidered resin magnet or Bill Clinton earrings.

Or, you can cover your head with a Unique Doo Rag with Republican Print while dressing your baby in a John McCain pirate onesie. There is always the option of accessorizing with a scrabble tile McCain necklace. You can hang some Not George Bush Framed Embroidery on your wall.

Etsy! Something for everyone!



Michelle Malkin is angry. Yes, I know, that’s pretty much her default state, but now she’s angry about someone else being angry. Specifically, she’s upset that former NAACP chairman Myrlie Evers-Williams was critical of the New Yorker’s recent “Obama as terrorist” cartoon. How the woman who got Dunkin’ Donuts to pull an ad campaign because she didn’t like the pattern on Rachel Ray’s scarf can accuse anyone else of needing to “grow a brain” is a philosophical question not appropriate to discuss here, because the real gem of a comment comes from one of Michell’s faithful followers, one “emjem24″:

I wanted to mention what a shame that people like this woman keep bringing up “lynching” and in the same way, do a disservice to the black community.

Many blacks paid for HER civil rights with their lives. Does she get that or are their deaths just so much more politically expedient for the joy of using that word like some self-fulfilling prophecy or something?

I wonder if all the family members of those who’ve been lynched would accept such “death politicization?” It’s really a shame.

One more thing, it must be so “hard” to be black like her. Accuse others of “lynching” when they criticize you or even immortalize you in a cartoon.

Oye Vay, Ms. Evers-Williams needs a new schtick ’cause this one’s gettin’ real old. Do you think she cares about the impact of illegal immigration in the black community?

For those not in the know, here’s an article about Ms. Evers-Williams deceased husband.

Yes, that’s right. The widow of slain civil rights activist Medgar Evers was just accused of not only being stupid, but of not appreciating the sacrifices those in the civil rights movement have paid.

So, are American conservatives just completely and utterly without any sense of shame or human decency, or hopelessly stupid?



The Swamp is the Chicago Tribune’s politics blog, and like most blogs of its type, it runs a little bit of commentary, a little bit of snark, and a little bit of stuff that probably wouldn’t make the paper even on a slow Sunday.

Case in point: to accompany an otherwise-standard election fund-raising story, they ran a mundane, even banal photo of presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama wearing a helmet while riding a bicycle on Chicago’s South Side. And sure, nobody looks good in a bicycle helmet, as Obama conceded at a Thursday night fundraiser:

“I had an internal debate,” Obama admitted, when a supporter thanked him for wearing a helmet. “Because I knew that the AP was going to take a picture, and they were trying to portray it like Dukakis wearing that tank helmet.

“But I wanted to make sure that the children who saw that picture knew that even the Democratic nominee for president wears a helmet when he goes biking,” he said to applause.

Well, shucks. Hard to argue with that, politically calculated (“For the Children!”) or not. The photo business just barely adds interest to another campaign newsblip. Surely no one can make a mountain out of this molehill.

Haha, what a tool!!!!!
Ooh, I did it for the kids, always about the kids. C’mon, you are a part of the problem why these kids are such wimps today. When I was a kid, I never wore one, fell plenty of times but got right back up every time. Learned a lot of valuable lessons that way.

For example, “how to act like a douche in a public forum,” right, Ed? But at least you’re not reading a sinister political agenda into coverage of a bike helmet, like our cousin Vinny:

Still no article on McCains nationally televised Town
Hall meeting last night. Nah the swamp is not biased towards or Obama
otr anything like that. The swamp is clearly pushing an agenda. I dont
want to have to but I think I am going to have to put the swamp in the
idoits category along with Olberman, Limbaugh, Hannity, Mathews, Air
America, and Anne Coulter.

I will say this for Vinny: his idoits category is refreshingly non-partisan. His comment is even somewhat germane to the topic, and while it will get no points for spelling or grammatical elegance, it does at least have the virtue of seeming, well, sane.

Let us turn now to the comment of stan woodbridge, which is not germane, grammatically correct, nor… well. You’ll see:

Still no article on the hate America global warming
loons scaremongering and flooding of the Midwest? Flooding the
Republican heartland is no way to get our attention. We get it you hate
America, now leave this great country.

So if I parse this correctly, stan believes that “global warming loons,” by which I infer he means advocates of the climate change theory, are somehow causing the floods in the Midwest to scare Republicans into believing in climate change. Because they hate America.

Someone clearly forgot to wear his bicycle helmet one too many times.



The Democratic primary season is over, so let the post-mortems begin! Over at ABC.com, Matthew Dowd has submitted his contribution in what promises to be 2008′s biggest growth industry. There’s nothing in Dowd’s piece that hasn’t been already said, though this self-consciously “hep” analogy ranked high on the cringe-worthy index:

Obama was the Ipod of this election, while Clinton was the Walkman. The Walkman is reliable and easy to use and works great, it just doesn’t have the hip factor that an Ipod does.

So Obama will be replaced each six months by a slimmer model with more functionality? Go politics 2.0!

It’s the comments, however, where things really get “off da hook,” as the kidz say. (They do say that, right?)

“white woman ind. voter”:

SHE WAS TO SELF CENTERED ALL FOR HERSELF AND TO HECK WITH THE REAS OF YOU,NOW SHE WANT VEE P NO way THE ARE ALREADY USING HER WORDS TO SMEAR HIM THANKS HILLY YOU WITCH

“s.b.”:

Easy answer voter fraud at caucuses and at the DNC.

Fraud is Chicago politics as usual.

Too bad voter intimidation and rigging caucuses with out of state students wont work in a general election.

He is unelectable and Democrats are dumb. 35% of Clinton voters are walking.

Yeah, you do that. Take your ball, go home, and let a man eight orders of magnitude to the right of Clinton walk off with the election. THAT’LL SHOW THEM!

“freetradein” does some freestylin’:

hillary what a disasta…just like nafta…shakin’ hands with newt….keeping the vote open past 15 minutes and bribing houston congressperson with million dollar contracts….0 the humanity!…maybe she’ll get fsc

Word up, DNC! Supah-delegates represent!

“Joan”:

To All Obama Supporters: You go ahead keep being mean;guess what, Obama WILL lose in Nov. because a big portion of Hillary’s supporters, including my whole family, will vote for McCain in Nov.!

How to spot Joan’s family at the polling station: Look for the group of people who have cut off their noses to spite their faces.

“novote” smells a conspiracy:

Obama can get all the delegates and super ones too. Not my vote though.
I bet all the conspirators will eliminate write in candidates to prevent Hillary from the ballot.

“nomob” (who in no way is “novote” posting under a different user name) blames the media:

The media has helped to create the Obama momentum when it treated Obama as a rockstar and acted as his advance men during much of the early campaign.
Once the momentum is on track, the celebrity-blinded public just followed the crowd without questioning. And the crown got bigger and bigger.
Belatedly when the media started to look into the truth of this rock star Obama, all the eyebrow-raising questions about this man did not matter anymore because the blind passion obstructed any fact and truth.
Hillary’s message and her contributions to America have been washed away by the tsunami of the mob passion.
ANOTHER TRIUMPH OF THE MOB WITH THE HELP OF MEDIA DRUMMER BOYS.
CONGRATULATIONS! AMERICA.

…and after having read the umpteen near-identical screed along these lines:

I have a son 16 years old!
I do not mind him to go to Iraq if he wishes to go!
I would have votedd for hillary but will never vote for Obama!
I’d rather being in Iraq 4 more years than living in a communist coutry under Obama admin!
Go McCain
Janet thanks for the link!
I just donated %10 for McCain!

…the only thing I’m convinced of is that there needs to be a mandatory intelligence test before one can use the internet, much less vote in a national election.



San Francisco Chronicle:

I guess that major earthquake will occur in California sometime soon. God will punish this disgusting ruling. ALL FEDERAL FUNDING MUST BE CUT OFF. Sanctuary Cities, Homosexual marriages, Criminals let off the hook. This state is the downfall of America and her values. I’m disgraced to be a Californian, I’m moving to West Virgina.

Predicting an earthquake in California, as a sign of God’s wrath, is right up there with Sylvia Browne predicting a celebrity death at New Years…

The People of California VOTED against this by over 60%. RADICAL judges overturn the people’s will. THE PEOPLE still have the power, this will be overturned.

You’re going to hear this complaint a lot for the next few months, from people who failed High School Civics and don’t know what the role of judges is in our legal system.

Those dasterdly Republican judges on the California Supreme Court…

I think I’m going to start calling my CAT: “A DOG”! I know it’s NOT the same thing, but the California courts can re-define the meaning of “DOG”. It’s shouldn’t matter that the traditional definition of what a dog is has been around for hundreds of years! Lets change it for the CATS….Then in 10 years, the three blind mice can join together and be called “a DOG” too!!! In Fact, why not start re-defining everything….Cows are now “Horses”….Farts are now “Perfume”…and, 2 gays are now “Married”.

When working on a bill before it is voted into law, legal aspects are researched. Citizens on several occasions have voted that a marriage is a one man, one woman union. By the courts overturning the will of people, what are we voting for??? Moral issues are being ignored and we wonder why the children of today have no respect for others. Look at ancient history people-everytime great nations started going in this amoral mindset, it speeled the descent of their power. It is a matter of whether we want to repeat history or stand up and fight for our future.

Yeah! Just look at Rome! Oh, wait, their Empire didn’t collapse until they all converted to Christianity, and then Europe was plunged into the Dark Ages…

Los Angeles Times:

I have been a California resident since 1942. I have always been proud to be a resident of this God given beautiful state. But thanks to You THAT has changed, drastically changed FOR THE WORST!!. Where and when does it end??? OR WILL IT EVER. Have we truly become the Sodom and Gomorrah of these United States?? California and America are going down the drain flushing God at the same time. The oranges have disappeared we have become an orchard of lemons…

But…we’re famous for our lemons in California…

Every time we try to post something unflattering to gays, there is a SERVER ERROR?! Who is CENSORING this stuff? and WHY?

Clearly your computer is gay and is sabotaging you.

The State Supreme Court members who chose to strike down this law are not eligible for their jobs any more. they have proven they are insane. They are not eligible for workers comp or a retirement as this insanity is not caused by their jobs, merely they have never been sane as proven by previous decisions. The proof of their insanity on this decision: The institution of marriage has always been between a man and a woman or a man and multiple women. never between men and men or women and women. It was invented this way.

Wow, using a PRO-polygamy argument to attack gay marriage…that’s a new one.

California is already slowly falling into the ocean and burning up, why in GOD’s name would try to rush it. Allowing same-sex marriages is against the will of GOD. Get your bible and look for it.

The courts are going to be flooded with lawsuits for a lot more reasons than just this one. Whats going to happen if a minister or a justice of the peace refuses to marry gays? Lawsuits *which do cost taxpayers” are going to be flooding the courts. Hence judges will be able to justify above average pay raises and lawyers are going be making fortunes. The courts aren’t ruled by money? Then how do rich people get away with murdering someone? They pay lawyers that are corrupt and then they become corrupt judges.

Yes, you’ve stumbled upon our clever plot…use gay marriage as a means of creating a pay raise for judges…

This decision has major ramifications for public schools. No one in a school will be able to voice the opinion that same-sex marriage is wrong and unhealthy, despite morality or scientific studies. Teachers will be fired because of this. Schools will be required to adopt curriculum that encourages children to become homosexual.

And this is…bad?

Its our own fault. Give an inch, and they take a mile. Legislature allows for domestic partnership, and so the supreme court says that its not good enough. Our state allowed same-sex couples to adopt, and so now the supreme court says they need to step in and protect these children from the awfulness of being parented by only domestic partners. For these children, this decision will not make a hoot of difference. But for all the rest of our children, it will make a big difference.

How?

It is a shame that gays feel that they should be able to get married. Marriage is a joining in the physical and emotional and spiritual level and there is nothing natural about gays. If they want marriage then make up a gay word and go with it. What they have is not marriage and will never be marriage. They are an abomination before God and they will be dealt with by God and Hell will be like a big reunion for these abominations.

Well in the words of the Bard, sinners are much more fun.

THE WRONG DECISION WAS MADE. Californians voted 61% to define marriage as between a man and woman.How much more clear can the people be.It amazes me how a handful of radicals have the power to change the will of the people. All u homosexuals who push for rights u say you’re entitled to, put a sock in it. Ur just asking for special treatment.U want ur lifestyle granted special rights crying discrimination.Since when was marriage a right of the people. It’s a common good not a special interest. Stop trying to redefine marriage. The mere defintion of marriage is A UNION BETWEEN MAN AND WOMAN. Find your own union and stop trying to change ours

This is horriable. Marriage is defined between a man and woman. The Bible,The Constitution al says this. I pray God has mercy on California. The Last Days spoken about in the Bible are here. Come Lord Jesus!

THIS IS A DAMN SHAME!!!!!WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO.ITS SICK TO SEE,ITS MAKES MY STOMACHE TURN.IF IT WAS OKAY FOR PEOPLE TO BE GAY THEN NONE OF US WOULD BE HERE TODAY.I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE THINK THAT THIS IS OKAY.IT IS NOT.THEY WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH GOD.

He is making law which is not his job. The people spoke and he ignored them. Time to put him in the tuna boat, place cement shoes on his feet, and let him swim vertical.

Hey, FBI, the user name of the guy who just threatened a judge is “sdsunandfun.” Might want to look into that.

God gave the presidents and judges authority to make sure that God’s precepts are engaged in people’s social interactions.They will be judged too if they lead people wrongly.It is a sin and no matter how you can argue it is true and whether you can be so blinded,your spirit inside really knows the truth

I wasn’t aware that God wrote the Constitution.

Why should laws or rights for Gay/ Lesbian/ Transgender/ Bisexual etc.etc be placed into Law? What of the thousands upon thousands who have returned to their natural anatomical state of mind and said, “Whew, that was a weird trip, I’m glad I’m back to normal. I’m a man (or woman).” If these thousands have changed back to who they were born to be, are we then inacting laws for nothing? By the way, Whats the true definition of a minority?

Someone is clearly a bit confused as to how homosexuality works…I don’t think it’s me.

Let the court spend its time on why this state has no balanced budget. Is there fiscal mismangement within the legisla-ture? Hmmm. Lets have the court asses penalties for bad job performance. Men and women, stop discriminating against yourselves. If you see a bird, are you going to call it a car? I think not. A bird is a bird is a bird. You are what you are. You can do and think what ever you want about your body. Drugs, alcohol, psychiatry various operations, shots and hormones may sway your mind or change the outside. But at the end of the day, you will know deep down that your are a man or woman.

The PEOPLE have spoken. Due to those who are bitter, the court has ruled and nullified the WILL of the PEOPLE. The judiciaries eyesights’ skewed on this matter. Question… Can you turn an orange into a pear? Answer…No. So, if once an orange, always an orange. If your a man or woman, you will always be a man or woman. Not sure? Check your natural anatomy. Why do the parts function/ fit correctly between a man and woman? Mistake? I think not. So is the court ruling on, FACTS? Or desires, wants and emotions? I think the latter. Men and women you are what you’ve been born to be. Return to your naturally born anatomical state of mind.

I suppose one would have to possess a sort of defiant, “in your face” attitude just to exist as an “out” homosexual; perhaps that explains the abundance of said attribute shown on this board. Ironically, the characteristic that allows you to survive may be the very thing that holds you back; your demands for acceptance make you, well, unacceptable.

Maybe the reason all these gays seem to want to violate social bounds is because THEY were violated as children, and maybe that is why they’re so perverse? Maybe they have become addicted to violating boundaries, pushing in where they are not wanted! So now they are cramming their sick lifestyle down the throats of Americans, just to somehow try to balance or “heal” their injured lives. Well, that’s tragic, all right, but why take it out on all of the rest of us?? Everyone has SOME sort of violation or injury in their past, but they don’t have to perpetuate and extend it like this to ruin the whole of society!

Children do best when they have healthy, well-balanced parents of male and female gender supporting and rearing them. Nobody said anything about hate. You gay people all think that those folks who are opposed to your gay “marriage” and adopting of kids HATE you, but they don’t. They just don’t feel you are QUALIFIED (stable enough) to be parenting innocent children. Hate has nothing to do with it. They just don’t want to see you raising children and distorting them. Get over yourselves and that chip on your shoulder.

Gee, with friends like you, no wonder gay people have chips on our shoulders.

You Are Heterosexual As the sun of the earth must rise To give sustaining warmth, light and life The son of man must rise For he has a purpose too To rise up and bring forth life With all that God has given him To honor and protect To defend the blood of his offspring To give and receive this love It takes a heterosexual The blueprint of the Creator You are heterosexual Praise Jesus!!!

gay marriage is wrong! and so are gays, its not normal nature and wasnt created so that 2 men or 2 females could reproduce.Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve, i dont care if your not religious. It’s still wrong and all of you know it. Whats next allowing people to marry animals? Our world has become so screwed up due to all this sin we put up with.

As a Christian for 27 years, I am sadden by their decision. I have an adult daughter and I feel I have to explain myself to other’s that she is my daughter,when we see one another we embrace with a kiss on the cheek. In other words I do not want othe’sr to think we are Lesbian. There is only a 16 years difference between my daughter and I. I have grandchildren’s and it sadden me to think that in school they are going to be taught that same sex lovers is okay, not to mention marriage. ;-(

I’m heterosexual and have been married for over 17 years w.5 kids and loving it. My husand and I still get our freak on doing just about all thing the gays do. What’t the problem with being straight? it is NATURAL. Why is it hard to hug and kiss the opposit sex. Why use artificial equipment when you can have the REAL DEAL?

MONEY talks. It is UNNATURAL to have intercourse with the same sex. Sex is for making babies. There is no such thing as old/new testament. The Bible is the Bible all of it. We can’t judge you but God can and he makes no mistakes. The Bible also says that man shall not kill. I guess we chose which part of the Bible to follow as long as it doesn’tg interfer with ones lifestyle. Guess now CA will decide that it’s ok for man to marry ANIMALS. You know how CA loves their pets and it wouldn’t be right to DISCRIMINATE.

I pity people who work at banquette facilities.

I think I like the anti-gay non-sequiters the most!

What an all time scum bag this judge is! Perversion is never a right or a way of life! This damn fool open the door to every other type of perversion you can thing of! Next thing you know family members will want the very same rights to marry their own brothers ans sisters or even their dog or what ever! This isn’t a real judge at all,this is a moron that has no respect for the common man or his family members either! This S.O.B. is just as sick minded as they are!

I am gay and stay in the closet. Looking at this judge. To me he looks gay and probably was his easiest lie to do. Same sex need to go back to the closet. Your screwing those of us that want to remain out of the lime light. Besides trying to force it down main stream AMERICAN. Your all sick!! Leave straight AMERICA alone and stop pushing your personal agenda down their throats. Many of us live our lives unabated and happy. SO, JUST SHUT UP!!!! YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTING ALL SAME-SEX PARTNER’S.

I think someone’s fibbing a little about being gay, in an effort to make a little “point.”

hey! god created you and he and the holy savoir disaprove of gay actions. and while your on the subject, have you heard of the man boy love assciation? yah they defended a gay whole idnapped a child raped him, killed him and then raped him again. so you can take you little mind of the table, you blinded hypocrit

Taxation without representation is so common now that they don’t even see any wrongdoing. The Constitution has been corrupted this is all to create a distraction and slip in 60k -120k year jobs for their cronies and give themselves fat cost of living raises. How dare the economy affect their standard of living! Wait and see when the voters vote this ruling down in the fall and the gay marriage doesn’t pass. The gay’s will be taking it in the behind and be mad at the voters for not wanting new taxes and departments of…. to oversee the new law when it was these money loving judges that will be the only ones that benefit as usual.

Gayness is a mental disorder. Its sole function is a virtual thinning of the heard through attrition. It is a good thing, It insures less competition for those men and women who’s brains function normally and who’s genes are sutible to be passed along to the next generation, AHHHH ! Nature at its finest….. I’m all for less competition .

Did these judges take in mind the costs associated with gay “marriages”? 1. Wouldn”t health insurance companies have to pay benefits to so-called “spouses” of same sex marriages? 2. SS benefit fund will go broke earlier when it has to cover survivors of same sex marriages? 3. Businesses will be forced to provide time off for illnesses of “spouses” in same sex marriages? I am sure that there are more financial ramifications. Added,just what we need in a collapsing economy,lets see illegal aliens costing over 300 billion a year because their corrupted government failed them too

*ahem* Actually, studies have found that there is a net economic bonus to legalizing same-sex marriage. But why let facts get in the way of a good hate rant?

Again and again the butt is not design for anal sex and the court should know that when you have sex in the butt you are creating health and medical conditon that will cost us more than you’ll ever know.to love is one thing but to feel it by the butt is wrong… point blank judges must be gay also.

NO They did not make the right decision ! It should have been left up to the people, this is supose to be a Demoracy ! They are training people to be used to having no rights and being run by a bad goverment ! This country is becoming week and turning our kids into Homo lovers. WE should be shooting these gays not accecpting them, and the Illegals as well. These two groups are destroying our country and I for one am doing my part when ever I have a chance against these two enemies!! Save the U.S. of A.

We should ask the Marines to come in and clean out the depraved minds and people that make these decisions. Their goal is to devise ways to make more money, feed corrupt lawyers, judges and politicians. Their god is money and finding more ways to make it. Thats what this will do, create more taxes, bet on it! The Marines are sworn to protect this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic. This isn’t a democracy, if you believe that they have brainwashed you. I would trust men that would lay their life on the line for me before this corrupt goverment.

So…your proposal is that we should go tell it to the Marines?

WE HAVE BECOME THE “ULTRA-HYPOCRATIC” SOCIETY THANKS TO NEW YORK CITY POLITICS AND ATTORNEYS FROM NYU.

This goes on for 300 pages, but that seems like a good place to stop…

And lastly, Free Republic…(you may want to don a HAZMAT suit):

the interest in retaining the traditional and well-established definition of marriage — cannot properly be viewed as a compelling state interestWell, I should just call myself a doctor then, because it’s just a traditional title right? And the court just ruled that “traditional and well-established definitions…cannot properly be viewed as compelling state interest”.

“Furthermore, in contrast to earlier times, our state now recognizes that an individual’s capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual’s sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individual’s sexual orientation — like a person’s race or gender — does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights. We therefore conclude that in view of the substance and significance of the fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship, the California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or heterosexual, and to same-sex couples as well as to opposite-sex couples.” Sexual orientation – like a person’s race or gender…(shakes head)

Er, yes, exactly. That was rather the point of the ruling.

And Sanda Day says it is wrong to target supreme court judges and all judges even if they make very stupid decisions?
These clowns need to be taken to the public square and held in stocks and have rotten veggies thrown at them at the very least.

Ya’ know…I truly don’t care that there are homosexuals in our world, our Country, or our State.

I really, and honestly do not care if they “do” each other all day long, and into the night…in the privacy and BEHIND the closed doors and curtained windows of their abode. It bothers me, not in the least.

My problem is my Constitutionally guaranteed right to pursue happiness has been abrogated by a Court in favor of the homosexuals’. And that ain’t right.

I have lived 55 years abiding by the Constitution, and the cultural traditions of this Country that we’ve had since, even before, it’s founding. And now, I’m forced into relinquishing my right to appease this minority group of immoral, unclean, unsafe, tools of satan.

Worse, I’m forced to pay for it, and I’m NOT even ALLOWED to voice my opinion in public; Or to or within earshot of, the object(s) of my discomfort, lest I be arrested and charged with hatred, which of course, is immoral also, but is made a crime by the same appeasers that force me to subjugate my happiness and rights to the more immoral minority filth and disease spreaders. And as a fine how do you do, kick in the pants, to top it all off, our children are being taught that their parents are bad people, and the same sexers, homesexual knee benders, are righteous and, gee whiz, just good, decent folks!

remember their argum,ent is they love each other

well you can love a sheep

they are not hurting anyone
well neither are you with the sheep

it is their buisiness what they do in their bedroom
well it is yours to with your sheep

every argument they use can used for having more thna one wife or marrying an animal

maybe the polymists should get the law changed in Utah using the very same arguments and see how the homo’s will go mad and not say about civil rights after all where is their civil rights

another sham marriage comes to a state

Seriously, what is WITH them and the bestiality arguments? My theory is, secretly they fear that they would marry a sheep, if only it were legal.

Which, by the way, it is in more states than gay marriage is legal in.

what about the civil rights of a kid, I grew up in foster homes and I always wanted a father and a mother, so what about kids today does a girl have to settle for two daddies

bizarre
to think outrage about a man having more than one wife at that ranch yet no outrage from libs about two men poking each other and thinking they should get married

very bizarre indeed

I think it’s time us Texans just close all borders surrounding Texas: the Mexico southern border and the U.S. north, east, and west borders.

Unsurprisingly, most of the rest of the country agrees with you…

And to think, people once made light of folks that married a cousin, and today condemn polygamy, while allowing the most disgusting, disease-ridden, subpopulation on the planet to legitimize their deviant behavior. Just as in ancient Rome, homosexuals will quickly access young boys, demanding leadership and access positions in the Boy Scouts. Already they enter schools to groom the little boys for what homosexuals have to offer—a version of the Will and Grace show.

Oh, there’s a surprise. The California Supreme Court supported the right of sodomites? Surprise, surprise, surprise. The cultural jihad of the left continues.

Again, worth repeating, these were Republican judges with a reputation for being STRICT Constitutionalists.

“California will be a third world country in 25 years.”

Umm… it is, NOW.

That’s why you see traditionally-minded Euro-Americans departing the state in increasing numbers.

I say…. let California go wherever it is going. We really don’t need it anymore, and California’s continued attachement to the “other 47” will serve only to drag the rest of the continental U.S. down.

Don’t agree? Then let me pose these questions:
If – today – California were no longer part of the United States, would the political “tilt” of the nation as a whole be more liberal, or more conservative?
If – today – California were no longer part of the United States, with its electoral votes removed, would Republican candidates have a better chance of winning the presidency, or worse?

Actually, I confidently predict that within 50 years, “Atzlan” (into which California will eventually be absorbed) will have become a reality, either as an independent nation, or a reunification with Mexico. The only way I can see it remaining part of the U.S.A. is by striking some kind of “autonomous home-rule” agreement, a la Serbia and Kosovo….

Aieee! La Reconquista!

NBC News just called it: “A big victory for gay rights!” The MSM is a disgusting propaganda machine for the homosexual agenda. They now use the same terminology as the homosexual thought police…using euphemisms like “gay rights.” Boycott all GE products. The earthquake cometh soon.

Even if there is a homo gene, it is still abnormal pathology. There is a gene for Parkinson’s disease too. People don’t choose to have Parkinson’s disease. But we treat it and we recognize it as a disease. We try to help people with it the best we can but we don’t say that it is natural and normal to have Parkinson’s because it’s not.

And lastly, this charming fellow from another Freeper thread on the topic:

38 posted on Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:37:53 AM by Lancey Howard


It was announced yesterday that Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) has a malignant brain tumor. As you’d expect, the political blogs and message boards were abuzz with the news and its potential ramifications for Bay State and national politics. Surprisingly enough, many of the bigger conservative sites and forums showed (via proactive moderation) a rare glimmer of class, and put aside the usual partisan rancor to offer the Senator and his family their empathy and best wishes, with only the occasional backhand swipe thrown into the mix. It’s a shame it takes an invasive form of brain cancer to bring out the decent side of those folks, but still…

Those of you jonesing for a fix of pure uncut stupidity need not worry, however, because the Newsarama forum thread on the subject is there to help you meet your RDA of internet-based idiocy:

From “Cyphon,” who isn’t afraid to wear his douchebaggery on his sleeve:

What is it with Kennedy boys and problems with their heads?

Yes, that was tasteless, but kinda funny, in a morbid kinda way.

Also, in a morbid kinda way: finally, Ted and Mary Joe will be reunited.

“Tabula Rasa” wants folks to know he’s not a total prick:

My first thought when Ted went into the hospital last weekend was some higher being must have struck him down from all the “moral” judgments he’d been tossing around for the last couple of weeks. Who is this guy to decide who has a better moral compass when he’s got blood on his hands? Too bad DNA testing wasn’t around during that era.

Best to his family though.

“spiderrob8″ states that doesn’t want the discussion to focus on the Chappaquiddick incident, then naturally posts repeatedly about the very same:

also, don’t people complain when people bring up Clinton when someone says Bush did something wrong?

What does Laura Bush’s thing when she was 17 have to do with Ted Kennedy and his leaving a woman-drowning or drowned-in a car for ten hours?

It’s irrelevant and an attempt to shift focus from his, documented, behavior.

Not the speculation-drunk, speeding, affair, etc-but the documented, factual behavior.

“GOSD” offers this nugget of wisdom, which misappropriates a complex philosophical concept to justify his warped line of reasoning:

His judgement = cowardice.

I consider his recent health issue karma.

“royce73″ explains why he’s living in his mom’s garage and pulling the night shift at Arby’s:

When I was in HS, I had to do a report and presentation on Teddy Kennedy. The presentation needed to have two visual aids. I choose a Matchbox car and a Ken doll wearing a night shirt and no pants.

God speed, Edward

For the record: This is why whenever anyone asks me what I think is wrong with comic books, the first answer that comes to mind is “the fans.”



I honestly cannot tell if this is meant to be serious or not

Yes it’s true that most eleven year-olds probably aren’t knowledgeable enough to make a well-informed choice about political candidates, but the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that most fifty year-olds aren’t very well-informed either. And yet, everyone gets to vote (and, of course, many people choose not to). Everyone, that is, except for that would-be eleven year-old voter.

An eleven year old cannot drive, drink, join the army, give blood, enter into a contract, have sex (in most states), get married (in most states) or work a forty hour a week job. But you want to let them vote?

I agree. I was almost arrested for voting fraud in my wayward youth when I tried to vote for Clinton at age 15. My own mother turned me in when she went to vote and saw my name on the list of eligible voters.

Yeah. Sure you did.

I can’t believe some of the stuff I’m reading. It’s a democratic right to vote, and lame arguments about how it won’t lead to the policies you want, or the average kid may be open to outside influences, do not override that. Everyone’s open to outside influences, and lots of voters are dumb and irrational. It’s simply much worse to NOT let some people vote (and their desires will be ignored) than it is to let some irrational people vote.

I think we should give computers the vote. But only Macs.

Oh, Lord, spare me the egos of Mac users…



The Pill Kills asks you to celebrate “Protest the Pill Day”.

June 7 marks the 43rd anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision Griswold v. Connecticut. This was the first of many decisions that led to the culture of death we live in today.

On that day in 1965, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the Griswold v. Connecticut case, it set a legal precedent for claiming that the Constitution grants women the right to privacy in matters of sexual practice. This meant that Connecticut and the rest of the United States could not stop a married woman from obtaining birth control pills. However, as Judge Andrew Napolitano has pointed out, the constitutional right to privacy has nothing to do with birth control.

The plaintiff was Estelle Griswold, then executive director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. She and Dr. C. Lee Buxton opened a birth control clinic. They were arrested and fined for selling birth control pills, which was illegal in Connecticut. The case was pushed all the way to the Supreme Court. In other words, Planned Parenthood was breaking the law; yet it turned this case into a legal precedent for selling contraception. Because of the Griswold case and others that followed, unmarried women and teenagers were later permitted to obtain birth control pills.



The esteemed livejournaller boxy_brown calls for an end to religious oppression:

The African-American community keeps saying that electing Obama would be a great step toward racial equality in America. The feminists say that electing Clinton would advance women’s rights. Perhaps if America ever elects a Christian President, he’ll finally be able to end the brutal oppression of Christians in this country.



« Previous PageNext Page »